| # Statement Completion |
| |
| ### Mission Statement |
| |
| The purpose of this feature is to add required syntax to the current |
| statement. The goal is to make the statement syntactically complete. |
| That is not possible to do in all cases. A best-effort attempt is made |
| when it cannot be done. |
| |
| ### Current Statement |
| |
| The term _statement completion_ comes from IntelliJ. It is also called |
| _smart enter_ there, which is a more general term. See the IntelliJ |
| [documentation.](https://www.jetbrains.com/help/idea/2017.1/auto-completing-code.html#statements_completion) |
| |
| Rather than restricting the functionality to statements, in the sense of the grammar construct |
| called _statement_, it is best to think of code constructs. Statement completion |
| can be used to add syntax to declarations, statements, and some expressions. |
| Generally, the syntax additions are punctuation marks, such as semicolons, |
| parentheses, and braces. |
| |
| The _current statement_ then, is the code construct being written in the |
| editor, as identified by the position of the editing cursor. The _cursor_ is the |
| primary editing cursor of the active editor in IntelliJ. We ignore multiple |
| secondary cursors. |
| |
| If the _current statement_ is already syntactically complete then the feature |
| just adds a newline. This will be the case when the cursor follows the closing |
| brace of the body of a for-statement or while-statement, for example. The model |
| used is that the user is creating code going forward, and when the |
| _smart enter_ keystroke is typed the user expects to see forward progress. |
| The cursor should end up at the most likely place to continue editing, regardless |
| of what errors may exist in previous code. It is as if the user said "I'm done |
| with this line. Finish it up and move me to the next line." |
| |
| ## Code Constructs |
| |
| There are a number of cases where a matching right parenthesis could be added |
| if it is missing. This feature has not been considered a priority since the |
| editor by default adds parenthesis in pairs. |
| |
| Generics are not currently handled. |
| |
| #### Declarations |
| |
| There is limited work to be done. |
| |
| - [x] Functions, methods, and classes can have a pair of braces added if they do not already have a body defined. |
| - [x] Functions and methods can have a closing parenthesis added to the parameter list. |
| - [x] Variables can have a semicolon added to terminate them. |
| |
| #### Expressions |
| |
| Also limited. |
| |
| - [x] Unterminated strings can have appropriate string |
| terminators added. |
| - [x] Lists that have not been properly terminated can |
| have closing brackets added (potentially with trailing commas). |
| - [x] Maps are not currently handled. The parser error recovery |
| gets confused by braces of code blocks too easily. |
| |
| #### Statements |
| |
| With actual statements, there are many more possibilities. |
| Statements that start with a keyword must have at least the |
| keyword in the partial statement in order for completion to |
| happen. |
| |
| ###### Do Statement |
| |
| This is one of the few cases where an actual word may be included. |
| If the `while` keyword is missing it will be added. |
| As long as the `do` keyword is present the braces for the body |
| will be added. If the `while` keyword is present or can be added |
| then the parentheses for the condition will be added, too. Finally, |
| the terminating semicolon will be added. |
| |
| ###### For Statement |
| |
| The parser cannot distinguish a for-statement from a for-each unless |
| either at least one semicolon or the `in` keyword is present in the |
| control parts. If neither is present then completion cannot do any |
| more than possibly add braces for the body. |
| |
| Given that the statement is actually a for-statement then the control |
| parts will be adjusted to ensure there are two semicolons. If the braces |
| for the body are missing then they will be added. |
| |
| ###### For-each Statement |
| |
| Braces for the body can be added if missing. |
| |
| ###### If Statement |
| |
| The if-else-etc construct could get arbitrarily complex, so |
| for simplicity the `else` keyword is ignored. Starting with nothing |
| but the `if` keyword, the parentheses for the condition will be added |
| and the braces for the body will be added. |
| |
| ###### Switch Statement |
| |
| Given the `switch` keyword, parentheses for the selector will be added |
| if absent and the braces for the body will be added. Also, for an |
| individual case or default clause the terminating colon will be added |
| if needed. To be clear, only the colon for the clause containing |
| the cursor will be added. |
| |
| ###### Try Statement |
| |
| If the statement is nothing more than the `try` keyword then the braces |
| for the body will be added. No clauses (on, catch, or finally) will be added. |
| |
| An on-clause will be completed by adding braces for its body, if absent. |
| |
| A catch-clause will be completed by adding parentheses for its |
| parameter list and braces for the body. |
| |
| A finally-clause will be completed by adding braces for its body. |
| |
| ###### While Statement |
| |
| This is structurally identical to the if-statement and the implementation |
| for both is shared. |
| |
| ###### Expression Statements |
| |
| These include method and function invocations. |
| - [x] Add closing parenthesis, if the expression is an invocation. |
| - [x] Add terminating semicolon. |
| |
| ###### Control-flow Blocks |
| |
| After finishing a `return` or `throw` in a block that is the |
| body of a control-flow statement (do, for, for-each, if, while) |
| then the cursor will be moved outside the block, ready to begin |
| the next statement following the control-flow statement. |
| ```dart |
| if (isFinished()) { |
| releaseResources(); |
| return; // invoke 'smart enter' here |
| } |
| // continue typing here |
| ``` |