One of the common challenges associated with debugging asynchronous code is that stack traces do not reference the code which led to the exception. The context is lost when execution cross asynchronous gap.
Consider the following code:
Future<int> inner() async { await null; // asynchronous gap print(StackTrace.current); // (*) return 0; } Future<int> outer() async { int process(int v) { return v + 1; } return await inner().then(process); } void main() async { await outer(); }
Producing synchronous stack trace at the line marked (*)
will yield the following:
#0 inner #1 _SuspendState._createAsyncCallbacks.thenCallback #2 _RootZone.runUnary #3 _SuspendState._awaitNotFuture.run #4 _microtaskLoop #5 _startMicrotaskLoop #6 _startMicrotaskLoop #7 _runPendingImmediateCallback #8 _RawReceivePort._handleMessage
Only a single frame corresponds to user code (#0 inner
) and the rest are dart:async
internals. Nothing in this stack trace mentions outer
or main
, which called inner
. This makes diagnosing issues based on a stack trace much harder.
To address this problem runtime system augments synchronous portion of the stack trace with an awaiter stack trace. Each awaiter frame represents a closure or a suspended async
function which will be invoked when the currently running asynchronous computation completes.
This support allows runtime system to produce the following output for the example given above:
#0 inner <asynchronous suspension> #1 outer.process <asynchronous suspension> #2 outer <asynchronous suspension> #3 main <asynchronous suspension>
To recover awaiter stack trace runtime follows through a chain of _Future
, _StreamController
and SuspendState
objects. The following diagram illustrates the path it takes to produce asynchronous stack trace in our initial example:
Each awaiter frame is a pair of (closure, nextFrame)
:
closure
is a listener which will be invoked when the future this frame is waiting on completes._SuspendState.thenCallback
which resumes execution after the await
.next
is an object representing the next awaiter frame, which is waiting for the completion of this awaiter frame.Unwinding rules can be summarised as follows:
closure
has a captured variable marked with @pragma('vm:awaiter-link')
variable then the value of that variable will be used as nextFrame
.nextFrame
is a _SuspendState
then _SuspendState.function_data
gives us _FutureImpl
or _AsyncStarStreamController
to look at.nextFrame
is _FutureImpl
then we can take the first _FutureListener
in listeners
and then the next frame is (listener.callback, listener.result)
.nextFrame
is _AsyncStarStreamController
then we get asyncStarStreamController.controller.subscription._onData
, which should give us an instance of _StreamIterator
, which inside contains a _FutureImpl
on which await for
is waiting.Awaiter unwinding is implemented in by [dart::StackTraceUtils::CollectFrames
] in [runtime/vm/stack_trace.cc
].
@pragma('vm:awaiter-link')
Dart code which does not use async
/async*
functions and instead uses callbacks and lower-level primitives can integrate with awaiter frame unwinding by annotating variables which link to the next awaiter frame with @pragma('vm:awaiter-link')
.
Consider the following variation of the example:
Future<int> outer() { final completer = Completer<int>(); int process(int v) { completer.complete(v); } inner().then(process); return completer.future; }
Running this would produce the following stack trace:
#0 inner <asynchronous suspension> #1 outer.process <asynchronous suspension>
Runtime is unable to unwind the awaiter stack past process
. However if completer
is annotated with @pragma('vm:awaiter-link')
then unwinder will know where to continue:
Future<int> outer() { @pragma('vm:awaiter-link') final completer = Completer<int>(); // ... }
#0 inner <asynchronous suspension> #1 outer.process <asynchronous suspension> #2 main <asynchronous suspension>
vm:awaiter-link
can be used in dart:async
internals to avoid hardcoding recognition of specific methods into the runtime system, see for example _SuspendState.thenCallback
or Future.timeout
implementations.