The Dart programming language has an optional, unsound type system. Although it is similar in appearance to languages such as Java, C#, or C++, its type system and static checking are fundamentally different. It permits erroneous behavior in ways that may be surprising to programmers coming from those and other conventional typed languages.
In Dart, static type annotations can be often misleading. Dart code such as:
var list = ["hello", "world"]; List<int> listOfInts = list;
produces neither static nor runtime errors. Actual errors may show up much later on, e.g., with the following code, only at runtime on the invocation of abs:
Iterable<int> iterableOfInts = listOfInts.map((i) => i.abs());
Strong mode aims to catch such errors early by validating that variables - e.g., listOfInts - actually match their corresponding static type annotations - e.g., List<int>. It constrains the Dart programming language to a subset of programs that type check under a restricted set of rules. It statically rejects examples such as the above.
To accomplish this, strong mode involves the following:
Type inference. Dart’s standard type rules treats untyped variables as dynamic, which suppresses any static warnings on them. Strong mode infers static types based upon context. In the example above, strong mode infers that list has type List. Note, in strong mode, programmers may still explicitly use the dynamic type.
Strict subtyping. Dart’s primary sources of unsoundness are due to its subtyping rules on function types and generic classes. Strong mode restricts these: e.g., List may not used as List<int> in the example above.
Generic methods. Standard Dart does not yet provide generic methods. This makes certain polymorphic methods difficult to use soundly. For example, the List.map invocation above is statically typed to return an Iterable<dynamic> in standard Dart. Strong mode allows methods to be annotated as generic. List.map is statically typed to return an Iterable<T> where T is bound to int in the previous example. A number of common higher-order methods are annotated and checked as generic in strong mode, and programmers may annotate their own methods as well.
Strong mode is designed to work in conjunction with the Dart Dev Compiler (DDC), which uses static type verification to generate better code. DDC augments strong mode static checking with a minimal set of runtime checks that aim to provide full soundness of types.
Strong mode static analysis may also be used alone for stricter error checking.
Formal details of the strong mode type system may be found here.
Strong mode is now integrated into the Dart Analyzer. The analyzer may be invoked in strong mode as follows:
$ dartanalyzer --strong myapp.dart
Strong mode may also be enabled in IDEs by creating (if necessary) an .analysis_options file in your project and appending the following entry to it:
analyzer: strong-mode: true
With strong mode, we want to provide stronger typing while preserving the terseness of Dart. Idiomatic Dart code discourages type annotations outside of API boundaries, and user shouldn't have to add more types to get better checking. Instead, strong mode uses type inference.
In Dart, per the specification, the static type of a variable x declared as:
var x = <String, String>{ "hello": "world"};
is dynamic as there is no explicit type annotation on the left-hand side. To discourage code bloat, the Dart style guide generally recommends omitting these type annotations in many situations. In these cases, the benefits of strong mode would be lost.
To avoid this, strong mode uses type inference. In the case above, strong mode infers and enforces the type of x as Map<String, String>. An important aspect to inference is ordering: when an inferred type may be used to infer another type. To maximize the impact, we perform the following inference:
Inference may tighten the static type as compared to the Dart specification. An implicitly dynamic type, either alone or in the context of a function or generic parameter type, is inferred to a more specific type. This inference may result in stricter type errors than standard Dart.
In DDC, inference may also affect the reified runtime type.
Strong mode infers any untyped top-level field or static field from the type of its initializer. The static type of the declared variable is inferred as the static type of the initializer. For example, consider:
var PI = 3.14159; var radius = 2; var circumference = 2 * PI * radius;
Strong mode infers the static type of PI as double and radius as int directly from their initializers. It infers the static type of circumference as double, transitively using the other inferred types. Standard Dart rules would treat all of these static types as dynamic. Note that the following later assignment would be allowed in standard Dart, but disallowed (as a static type error) in strong mode:
radius = "five inches";
Strong mode inference avoids circular dependences. If a variable’s initializer expression refers to another variable whose type would be dependent (directly or indirectly) on the first, the static type of that other variable is treated as dynamic for the purpose of inference.
Strong mode performs two types of inference on instance fields and methods.
The first uses base types to constrain overrides in subtypes. Consider the following example:
abstract class A { Map get m; int value(int i); } class B extends A { var m; value(i) => m[i]; … }
In Dart, overridden method, getter, or setter types should be subtypes of the corresponding base class ones (otherwise, static warnings are given). In standard Dart, the above declaration of B is not an error: both m’s getter type and value’s return type are dynamic.
Strong mode -- without inference -- would disallow this: if m in B could be assigned any kind of object, including one that isn't a Map, it would violate the type contract in the declaration of A.
However, rather than rejecting the above code, strong mode employs inference to tighten the static types to obtain a valid override. The corresponding types in B are inferred as if it was:
class B extends A { Map m; int value(int i) => m[i]; … }
Note that tightening the argument type for i to int is not required for soundness; it is done for convenience as it is the typical intent. The programmer may explicitly type this as dynamic or Object to avoid inferring the narrower type.
The second form inference is limited to instance fields (not methods) and is similar to that on static fields. For instance fields where the static type is omitted and an initializer is present, the field’s type is inferred as the initializer’s type. In this continuation of our example:
class C extends A { var y = 42; var m = <int, int>{ 0: 38}; ... }
the instance field y has inferred type int based upon its initializer. Note that override-based inference takes precedence over initializer-based inference. The instance field m has inferred type Map, not Map<int, int> due to the corresponding declaration in A.
As with fields, local variable types are inferred if the static type is omitted and an initializer expression is present. In the following example:
Object foo(int x) { final y = x + 1; var z = y * 2; return z; }
the static types of y and z are both inferred as int in strong mode. Note that local inference is done in program order: the inferred type of z is computed using the inferred type of y. Local inference may result in strong mode type errors in otherwise legal Dart code. In the above, a second assignment to z with a string value:
z = "$z";
would trigger a static error in strong mode, but is allowed in standard Dart. In strong mode, the programmer must use an explicit type annotation to suppress inference. Explicitly declaring z with the type Object or dynamic would suffice in this case.
Strong mode also performs contextual inference on allocation expressions. This inference is rather different from the above: it tightens the runtime type of the corresponding expression using the static type of its context. Contextual inference is used on expressions that allocate a new object: closure literals, map and list literals, and explicit constructor invocations (i.e., via new or const).
In DDC, these inferred types are also reified at runtime on the newly allocated objects to provide a stronger soundness guarantee.
Consider the following example:
int apply(int f(int arg), int value) { return f(value); } void main() { int result = apply((x) { x = x * 9 ~/ 5; return x + 32; }, 41); print(result); }
The function apply takes another function f, typed (int) -> int, as its first argument. It is invoked in main with a closure literal. In standard Dart, the static type of this closure literal would be (dynamic) -> dynamic. In strong mode, this type cannot be safely converted to (int) -> int : it may return a String for example.
Dart has a syntactic limitation in this case: it is not possible to statically annotate the return type of a closure literal.
Strong mode sidesteps this difficulty via contextual inference. It infers the closure type as (int) -> int. Note, this may trigger further inference and type checks in the body of the closure.
Similarly, strong mode infers tighter runtime types for list and map literals. E.g., in
List<String> words = [ "hello", "world" ];
the runtime type is inferred as List<String> in order to match the context of the left hand side. In other words, the code above type checks and executes as if it was:
List<String> words = <String>[ "hello", "world" ];
Similarly, the following will now trigger a static error in strong mode:
List<String> words = [ "hello", 42 ]; // Strong Mode Error: 42 is not a String
Contextual inference may be recursive:
Map<List<String>, Map<int, int>> map = { ["hello"]: { 0: 42 }};
In this case, the inner map literal is inferred as a Map<int, int>. Note, strong mode will statically reject code where the contextually required type is not compatible. This will trigger a static error:
Map<List<String>, Map<int, int>> map = { ["hello"]: { 0: "world" }}; // STATIC ERROR
as “world” is not of type int.
Finally, strong mode performs similar contextual inference on explicit constructor invocations via new or const. For example:
Set<String> string = new Set.from(["hello", "world"]);
is treated as if it was written as:
Set<String> string = new Set<String>.from(<String>["hello", "world"]);
Note, as above, context is propagated downward into the expression.
The primary sources of unsoundness in Dart are generics and functions. Both introduce circularity in the Dart subtyping relationship.
Generics in Dart are covariant, with the added rule that the dynamic type may serve as both ⊤ (top) and ⊥ (bottom) of the type hierarchy in certain situations. For example, let <:D represent the standard Dart subtyping rule. Then, for all types S and T:
List<S> <:D List<dynamic> <:D List<T>
where List is equivalent to List<dynamic>. This introduces circularity - e.g.:
List<int> <:D List <:D List<String><:D List <:D List<int>
From a programmer’s perspective, this means that, at compile-time, values that are statically typed List<int> may later be typed List<String> and vice versa. At runtime, a plain List can interchangeably act as a List<int> or a List<String> regardless of its actual values.
The example taken from here exploits this:
class MyList extends ListBase<int> implements List { Object length; MyList(this.length); operator[](index) => "world"; operator[]=(index, value) {} }
A MyList may masquerade as a List<int> as it is transitively a subtype:
MyList <:D List <:DList<int>
In strong mode, we introduce a stricter subtyping rule <:S to disallow this. In this case, in the context of a generic type parameter, dynamic may only serve as ⊤. This means that this is still true:
List<int> <:S List
but that this is not:
List <:S List<int>
The example above fails in strong mode:
MyList <:S List <:S List<int>
The other primary source of unsoundness in Dart is function subtyping. An unusual feature of the Dart type system is that function types are bivariant in both the parameter types and the return type (see Section 19.5 of the Dart specification). As with generics, this leads to circularity:
(int) -> int <:D (Object) -> Object <:D (int) -> int
And, as before, this can lead to surprising behavior. In Dart, an overridden method’s type should be a subtype of the base class method’s type (otherwise, a static warning is given). In our running example, the (implicit) MyList.length getter has type:
() -> Object
while the List.length getter it overrides has type:
() -> int
This is valid in standard Dart as:
() -> Object <:D () -> int
Because of this, a length that returns “hello” (a valid Object) triggers no static or runtime warnings or errors.
Strong mode enforces the stricter, traditional function subtyping rule: subtyping is contravariant in parameter types and covariant in return types. This permits:
() -> int <:S () -> Object
but disallows:
() -> Object <:S () -> int
With respect to our example, strong mode requires that any subtype of a List have an int-typed length. It statically rejects the length declaration in MyList.
Strong mode introduces generic methods to allow more expressive typing on polymorphic methods. Such code in standard Dart today often loses static type information. For example, the Iterable.map method is declared as below:
abstract class Iterable<E> { ... Iterable map(f(E e)); }
Regardless of the static type of the function f, the map always returns an Iterable<dynamic> in standard Dart. As result, standard Dart tools miss the obvious error on the following code:
Iterable<int> results = <int>[1, 2, 3].map((x) => x.toString()); // Static error only in strong mode
The variable results is statically typed as if it contains int values, although it clearly contains String values at runtime.
The generic methods proposal adds proper generic methods to the Dart language as a first class language construct and to make methods such as the Iterable.map generic.
To enable experimentation, strong mode provides a generic methods prototype based on the existing proposal, but usable on all existing Dart implementations today. Strong mode relies on this to report the error on the example above.
The Iterable.map method is now declared as follows:
abstract class Iterable<E> { ... Iterable/*<T>*/ map/*<T>*/(/*=T*/ f(E e)); }
At a use site, the generic type may be explicitly provided or inferred from context:
var l = <int>[1, 2, 3];
var i1 = l.map((i) => i + 1);
var l2 = l.map/*<String>*/((i) { ... });
In the first invocation of map, the closure is inferred (from context) as int -> int, and the generic type of map is inferred as int accordingly. As a result, i1 is inferred as Iterable<int>. In the second, the type parameter is explicitly bound to String, and the closure is checked against this type. i2 is typed as Iterable<String>.
Further details on generic methods in strong mode and in DDC may be found here.
In addition to stricter typing rules, strong mode enforces other restrictions on Dart programs.
Strong mode effectively treats all standard Dart static warnings as static errors. Most of these warnings are required for soundness (e.g., if a concrete class is missing methods required by a declared interface). A full list of Dart static warnings may found in the Dart specification, or enumerated here:
https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/blob/master/pkg/analyzer/lib/src/generated/error.dart#L3772
In the context of constructor initializer lists, strong mode restricts super invocations to the end. This restriction simplifies generated code with minimal effect on the program.
In for-in statements of the form:
for (var i in e) { … }
Strong mode requires the expression e to be an Iterable. When the loop variable i is also statically typed:
for (T i in e) { … }
the expression e is required to be an Iterable<T>.
Note: we may weaken these.
By default, fields are overridable in Dart.
int init(int n) { print('Initializing with $n'); return n; } class A { int x = init(42); } class B extends A { int x; }
Disallow overriding fields: this results in complicated generated code where a field definition in a subclass shadows the field definition in a base class but both are generally required to be allocated. Users should prefer explicit getters and setters in such cases. See issue 52.
This is an optional feature of strong mode. It disables implicit down casts. For example:
main() { num n = 0.5; int x = n; // error: invalid assignment int y = n as int; // ok at compile time, might fail when run }
Casts from dynamic must be explicit as well:
main() { dynamic d = 'hi'; int x = d; // error: invalid assignment int y = d as int; // ok at compile time, might fail when run }
This option is experimental and may be changed or removed in the future. Feedback is appreciated! Contact us at our mailing list. Try it out in your project by editing .analysis_options:
analyzer: strong-mode: implicit-casts: False
Or pass --no-implicit-casts to Dart Analyzer:
dartanalyzer --strong --no-implicit-casts my_app.dart
This is an optional feature of analyzer, intended primarily for use with strong mode's inference. It rejects implicit uses of dynamic that strong mode inference fails to fill in with a concrete type, ensuring that all types are either successfully inferred or explicitly written. For example:
main() { var x; // error: implicit dynamic var i = 123; // okay, inferred to be `int x` dynamic y; // okay, declared as dynamic }
This also affects: parameters, return types, fields, creating objects with generic type, generic functions/methods, and supertypes:
// error: parameters and return types are implicit dynamic f(x) => x + 42; dynamic f(dynamic x) => x + 42; // okay int f(int x) => x + 42; // okay class C { var f; // error: implicit dynamic field dynamic f; // okay } main() { var x = []; // error: implicit List<dynamic> var y = [42]; // okay: List<int> var z = <dynamic>[]; // okay: List<dynamic> T genericFn<T>() => null; genericFn(); // error: implicit genericFn<dynamic> genericFn<dynamic>(); // okay int x = genericFn(); // okay, inferred genericFn<int> } // error: implicit supertype Iterable<dynamic> class C extends Iterable { /* ... */ } // okay class C extends Iterable<dynamic> { /* ... */ }
This feature is to prevent accidental use of dynamic in code that does not intend to use it.
This option is experimental and may be changed or removed in the future. Feedback is appreciated! Contact us at our mailing list. Try it out in your project by editing .analysis_options:
analyzer: strong-mode: implicit-dynamic: False
Or pass --no-implicit-dynamic to Dart Analyzer:
dartanalyzer --strong --no-implicit-dynamic my_app.dart
is and as checks are unsound for certain types (generic classes, certain function types). In DDC, problematic is and as checks trigger runtime errors. We are considering introducing static errors for these cases.