| // Copyright (c) 2022, the Dart project authors. Please see the AUTHORS file |
| // for details. All rights reserved. Use of this source code is governed by a |
| // BSD-style license that can be found in the LICENSE file. |
| import 'package:analyzer/dart/ast/ast.dart'; |
| import 'package:analyzer/dart/ast/token.dart'; |
| |
| import 'piece/list.dart'; |
| |
| extension AstNodeExtensions on AstNode { |
| /// The first token at the beginning of this AST node, not including any |
| /// tokens for leading doc comments. |
| /// |
| /// If [node] is an [AnnotatedNode], then [beginToken] includes the |
| /// leading doc comment, which we want to handle separately. So, in that |
| /// case, explicitly skip past the doc comment to the subsequent metadata |
| /// (if there is any), or the beginning of the code. |
| Token get firstNonCommentToken { |
| return switch (this) { |
| AnnotatedNode(metadata: [var annotation, ...]) => annotation.beginToken, |
| AnnotatedNode(firstTokenAfterCommentAndMetadata: var token) => token, |
| _ => beginToken |
| }; |
| } |
| |
| /// The comma token immediately following this if there is one, or `null`. |
| Token? get commaAfter { |
| var next = endToken.next!; |
| if (next.type == TokenType.COMMA) return next; |
| |
| // TODO(sdk#38990): endToken doesn't include the "?" on a nullable |
| // function-typed formal, so check for that case and handle it. |
| if (next.type == TokenType.QUESTION && next.next!.type == TokenType.COMMA) { |
| return next.next; |
| } |
| |
| return null; |
| } |
| |
| /// Whether there is a comma token immediately following this. |
| bool get hasCommaAfter => commaAfter != null; |
| |
| /// Whether this node is a statement or member with a braced body that isn't |
| /// empty. |
| /// |
| /// Used to determine if a blank line should be inserted after the node. |
| bool get hasNonEmptyBody { |
| AstNode? body; |
| var node = this; |
| if (node is MethodDeclaration) { |
| body = node.body; |
| } else if (node is FunctionDeclarationStatement) { |
| body = node.functionDeclaration.functionExpression.body; |
| } else if (node is FunctionDeclaration) { |
| body = node.functionExpression.body; |
| } |
| |
| return body is BlockFunctionBody && body.block.statements.isNotEmpty; |
| } |
| |
| /// Whether this node is a bracket-delimited collection literal. |
| bool get isCollectionLiteral => |
| this is ListLiteral || this is RecordLiteral || this is SetOrMapLiteral; |
| |
| bool get isControlFlowElement => this is IfElement || this is ForElement; |
| |
| /// Whether this is immediately contained within an anonymous |
| /// [FunctionExpression]. |
| bool get isFunctionExpressionBody => |
| parent is FunctionExpression && parent!.parent is! FunctionDeclaration; |
| |
| /// Whether [node] is a spread of a non-empty collection literal. |
| bool get isSpreadCollection => spreadCollectionBracket != null; |
| |
| /// If this is a spread of a non-empty collection literal, then returns the |
| /// token for the opening bracket of the collection, as in: |
| /// |
| /// [ ...[a, list] ] |
| /// // ^ |
| /// |
| /// Otherwise, returns `null`. |
| Token? get spreadCollectionBracket { |
| var node = this; |
| if (node is SpreadElement) { |
| var expression = node.expression; |
| if (expression is ListLiteral) { |
| if (expression.elements.canSplit(expression.rightBracket)) { |
| return expression.leftBracket; |
| } |
| } else if (expression is SetOrMapLiteral) { |
| if (expression.elements.canSplit(expression.rightBracket)) { |
| return expression.leftBracket; |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| |
| return null; |
| } |
| |
| /// If this is a spread of a non-empty collection literal, then returns `this` |
| /// as a [SpreadElement]. |
| /// |
| /// Otherwise, returns `null`. |
| SpreadElement? get spreadCollection { |
| var node = this; |
| if (node is! SpreadElement) return null; |
| |
| return switch (node.expression) { |
| ListLiteral(:var elements, :var rightBracket) || |
| SetOrMapLiteral(:var elements, :var rightBracket) |
| when elements.canSplit(rightBracket) => |
| node, |
| _ => null, |
| }; |
| } |
| } |
| |
| extension AstIterableExtensions on Iterable<AstNode> { |
| /// Whether there is a comma token immediately following this. |
| bool get hasCommaAfter => isNotEmpty && last.hasCommaAfter; |
| |
| /// Whether the delimited construct containing these nodes and terminated by |
| /// [rightBracket] can have a split inside it. |
| /// |
| /// We disallow splitting for entirely empty delimited constructs like `[]`, |
| /// but allow a split if there are elements or comments inside. |
| bool canSplit(Token rightBracket) => |
| isNotEmpty || rightBracket.precedingComments != null; |
| } |
| |
| extension ExpressionExtensions on Expression { |
| /// Whether this expression is a non-empty delimited container for inner |
| /// expressions that allows "block-like" formatting in some contexts. For |
| /// example, in an assignment, a split in the assigned value is usually |
| /// indented: |
| /// |
| /// var variableName = |
| /// longValue; |
| /// |
| /// But if the initializer is block-like, we don't split at the `=`: |
| /// |
| /// var variableName = [ |
| /// element, |
| /// ]; |
| /// |
| /// Likewise, in an argument list, block-like expressions can avoid splitting |
| /// the surrounding argument list: |
| /// |
| /// function([ |
| /// element, |
| /// ]); |
| /// |
| /// Completely empty delimited constructs like `[]` and `foo()` don't allow |
| /// splitting inside them, so are not considered block-like. |
| bool get canBlockSplit => blockFormatType != BlockFormat.none; |
| |
| /// When this expression is in an argument list, what kind of block formatting |
| /// category it belongs to. |
| BlockFormat get blockFormatType { |
| return switch (this) { |
| // Unwrap named expressions to get the real expression inside. |
| NamedExpression(:var expression) => expression.blockFormatType, |
| |
| // Allow the target of a single-section cascade to be block formatted. |
| CascadeExpression(:var target, :var cascadeSections) |
| when cascadeSections.length == 1 && target.canBlockSplit => |
| BlockFormat.invocation, |
| |
| // A function expression can use either a non-empty parameter list or a |
| // non-empty block body for block formatting. |
| FunctionExpression(:var parameters?, :var body) |
| when parameters.parameters.canSplit(parameters.rightParenthesis) || |
| (body is BlockFunctionBody && |
| body.block.statements.canSplit(body.block.rightBracket)) => |
| BlockFormat.function, |
| |
| // An immediately invoked function expression is formatted like a |
| // function expression. |
| FunctionExpressionInvocation(:FunctionExpression function) |
| when function.blockFormatType == BlockFormat.function => |
| BlockFormat.function, |
| |
| // Non-empty collection literals can block split. |
| ListLiteral(:var elements, :var rightBracket) || |
| SetOrMapLiteral(:var elements, :var rightBracket) |
| when elements.canSplit(rightBracket) => |
| BlockFormat.collection, |
| RecordLiteral(:var fields, :var rightParenthesis) |
| when fields.canSplit(rightParenthesis) => |
| BlockFormat.collection, |
| SwitchExpression(:var cases, :var rightBracket) |
| when cases.canSplit(rightBracket) => |
| BlockFormat.collection, |
| |
| // Function calls can block split if their argument lists can. |
| InstanceCreationExpression(:var argumentList) || |
| MethodInvocation(:var argumentList) |
| when argumentList.arguments.canSplit(argumentList.rightParenthesis) => |
| BlockFormat.invocation, |
| |
| // Note: Using a separate case instead of `||` for this type because |
| // Dart 3.0 reports an error that [argumentList] has a different type |
| // here than in the previous two clauses. |
| FunctionExpressionInvocation(:var argumentList) |
| when argumentList.arguments.canSplit(argumentList.rightParenthesis) => |
| BlockFormat.invocation, |
| |
| // Multi-line strings can. |
| StringInterpolation(isMultiline: true) => BlockFormat.collection, |
| SimpleStringLiteral(isMultiline: true) => BlockFormat.collection, |
| |
| // Parenthesized expressions unwrap the inner expression. |
| ParenthesizedExpression(:var expression) => expression.blockFormatType, |
| _ => BlockFormat.none, |
| }; |
| } |
| |
| /// Whether this is an argument in an argument list with a trailing comma. |
| bool get isTrailingCommaArgument { |
| var parent = this.parent; |
| if (parent is NamedExpression) parent = parent.parent; |
| |
| return parent is ArgumentList && parent.arguments.hasCommaAfter; |
| } |
| |
| /// Whether this is a method invocation that looks like it might be a static |
| /// method or constructor call without a `new` keyword. |
| /// |
| /// With optional `new`, we can no longer reliably identify constructor calls |
| /// statically, but we still don't want to mix named constructor calls into |
| /// a call chain like: |
| /// |
| /// Iterable |
| /// .generate(...) |
| /// .toList(); |
| /// |
| /// And instead prefer: |
| /// |
| /// Iterable.generate(...) |
| /// .toList(); |
| /// |
| /// So we try to identify these calls syntactically. The heuristic we use is |
| /// that a target that's a capitalized name (possibly prefixed by "_") is |
| /// assumed to be a class. |
| /// |
| /// This has the effect of also keeping static method calls with the class, |
| /// but that tends to look pretty good too, and is certainly better than |
| /// splitting up named constructors. |
| bool get looksLikeStaticCall { |
| var node = this; |
| if (node is! MethodInvocation) return false; |
| if (node.target == null) return false; |
| |
| // A prefixed unnamed constructor call: |
| // |
| // prefix.Foo(); |
| if (node.target is SimpleIdentifier && |
| _looksLikeClassName(node.methodName.name)) { |
| return true; |
| } |
| |
| // A prefixed or unprefixed named constructor call: |
| // |
| // Foo.named(); |
| // prefix.Foo.named(); |
| var target = node.target; |
| if (target is PrefixedIdentifier) target = target.identifier; |
| |
| return target is SimpleIdentifier && _looksLikeClassName(target.name); |
| } |
| |
| /// Whether [name] appears to be a type name. |
| /// |
| /// Type names begin with a capital letter and contain at least one lowercase |
| /// letter (so that we can distinguish them from SCREAMING_CAPS constants). |
| static bool _looksLikeClassName(String name) { |
| // Handle the weird lowercase corelib names. |
| if (name == 'bool') return true; |
| if (name == 'double') return true; |
| if (name == 'int') return true; |
| if (name == 'num') return true; |
| |
| // TODO(rnystrom): A simpler implementation is to test against the regex |
| // "_?[A-Z].*?[a-z]". However, that currently has much worse performance on |
| // AOT: https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/37785. |
| const underscore = 95; |
| const capitalA = 65; |
| const capitalZ = 90; |
| const lowerA = 97; |
| const lowerZ = 122; |
| |
| var start = 0; |
| var firstChar = name.codeUnitAt(start++); |
| |
| // It can be private. |
| if (firstChar == underscore) { |
| if (name.length == 1) return false; |
| firstChar = name.codeUnitAt(start++); |
| } |
| |
| // It must start with a capital letter. |
| if (firstChar < capitalA || firstChar > capitalZ) return false; |
| |
| // And have at least one lowercase letter in it. Otherwise it could be a |
| // SCREAMING_CAPS constant. |
| for (var i = start; i < name.length; i++) { |
| var char = name.codeUnitAt(i); |
| if (char >= lowerA && char <= lowerZ) return true; |
| } |
| |
| return false; |
| } |
| } |
| |
| extension CascadeExpressionExtensions on CascadeExpression { |
| /// Whether a cascade should be allowed to be inline with the target as |
| /// opposed to moving the sections to the next line. |
| bool get allowInline => switch (target) { |
| // Cascades with multiple sections always split. |
| _ when cascadeSections.length > 1 => false, |
| |
| // If the receiver is an expression that makes the cascade's very low |
| // precedence confusing, force it to split. For example: |
| // |
| // a ? b : c..d(); |
| // |
| // Here, the cascade is applied to the result of the conditional, not |
| // just "c". |
| ConditionalExpression() => false, |
| BinaryExpression() => false, |
| PrefixExpression() => false, |
| AwaitExpression() => false, |
| |
| // Otherwise, the target doesn't force a split. |
| _ => true, |
| }; |
| } |
| |
| extension AdjacentStringsExtensions on AdjacentStrings { |
| /// Whether subsequent strings should be indented relative to the first |
| /// string. |
| /// |
| /// We generally want to indent adjacent strings because it can be confusing |
| /// otherwise when they appear in a list of expressions, like: |
| /// |
| /// [ |
| /// "one", |
| /// "two" |
| /// "three", |
| /// "four" |
| /// ] |
| /// |
| /// Especially when these strings are longer, it can be hard to tell that |
| /// "three" is a continuation of the previous element. |
| /// |
| /// However, the indentation is distracting in places that don't suffer from |
| /// this ambiguity: |
| /// |
| /// var description = |
| /// "A very long description..." |
| /// "this extra indentation is unnecessary."); |
| /// |
| /// To balance these, we omit the indentation when an adjacent string |
| /// expression is in a context where it's unlikely to be confusing. |
| bool get indentStrings { |
| bool hasOtherStringArgument(List<Expression> arguments) => arguments |
| .any((argument) => argument != this && argument is StringLiteral); |
| |
| return switch (parent) { |
| ArgumentList(:var arguments) => hasOtherStringArgument(arguments), |
| |
| // Treat asserts like argument lists. |
| Assertion(:var condition, :var message) => |
| hasOtherStringArgument([condition, if (message != null) message]), |
| |
| // Don't add extra indentation in a variable initializer or assignment: |
| // |
| // var variable = |
| // "no extra" |
| // "indent"; |
| VariableDeclaration() => false, |
| AssignmentExpression(:var rightHandSide) when rightHandSide == this => |
| false, |
| |
| // Don't indent when following `:`. |
| MapLiteralEntry(:var value) when value == this => false, |
| NamedExpression() => false, |
| |
| // Don't indent when the body of a `=>` function. |
| ExpressionFunctionBody() => false, |
| _ => true, |
| }; |
| } |
| } |
| |
| extension PatternExtensions on DartPattern { |
| /// Whether this expression is a non-empty delimited container for inner |
| /// expressions that allows "block-like" formatting in some contexts. |
| /// |
| /// See [ExpressionExtensions.canBlockSplit]. |
| bool get canBlockSplit => switch (this) { |
| ConstantPattern(:var expression) => expression.canBlockSplit, |
| ListPattern(:var elements, :var rightBracket) => |
| elements.canSplit(rightBracket), |
| MapPattern(:var elements, :var rightBracket) => |
| elements.canSplit(rightBracket), |
| ObjectPattern(:var fields, :var rightParenthesis) || |
| RecordPattern(:var fields, :var rightParenthesis) => |
| fields.canSplit(rightParenthesis), |
| _ => false, |
| }; |
| } |
| |
| // TODO(rnystrom): This is a gross hack because dart_style 2.3.5 has a bad |
| // analyzer constraint which allows dart_style to be used with a version of |
| // analyzer that doesn't publicly expose the `.macroKeyword` getter. |
| // Fortunately, the oldest analyzer that dart_style allows *does* have the |
| // getter on the ClassDeclarationImpl class. |
| // |
| // To get users off that bad version, we're publishing a new version of |
| // dart_style that has the same constraint and gracefully handles that getter |
| // not statically being visible. |
| // |
| // This hack will be removed immediately after publishing a version with that |
| // fix. |
| extension ClassDeclarationExtensions on ClassDeclaration { |
| /// If the [ClassDeclaration] is from a version of analyzer that has the |
| /// `macroKeyword` getter and the class has a `macro` keyword, returns that |
| /// token. |
| /// |
| /// Otherwise, returns `null`. |
| Token? get hackMacroKeywordForOlderAnalyzer => |
| (this as dynamic).macroKeyword as Token?; |
| } |